Report & written by Ashok Yadav | Editor
In a landmark judgment upholding freedom of expression, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that mere criticism of the government or a Chief Minister cannot be treated as a criminal act. The court emphasized that journalists have the constitutional right to question and criticize the government without fear of prosecution.
The verdict came in connection with a case involving senior journalist Abhishek Upadhyay, who faced an FIR for publishing an online report that questioned certain government policies. The Supreme Court observed that such actions by authorities violate the fundamental right to free speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The bench stated that in a democracy, dissent and criticism are essential components of governance and accountability. The court further noted that constructive criticism should be welcomed by those in power, not punished.
This decision is being hailed as a historic moment for Indian journalism and a reaffirmation of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting press freedom. Legal experts say the ruling will serve as a strong precedent to prevent misuse of legal provisions against journalists and protect democratic values.
